This afternoon I had my second interview, this time with a professional dancer. It has given me such a different perspective on some of my questions and the topic areas that I am exploring. I was fascinated to hear about the experiences of this dancer and the company they are a part of. It is a company which is not in the UK and granted the culture is completely different to what we experience over here. Therefore it has given me a really broad perspective on how dancers are supported else where in the world and how they go about accessing legal support in the event that they find themselves in a dispute with an employer. I was actually shocked to hear about how regularly the terms of a dancers contract can be infringed - in my opinion it happens far to often and it frustrates me to think that trained professionals who dedicate their lives to their art form can be treated with so much disrespect. Chatting to this individual put it into perspective how much dancers may be calling out for help and advice regarding their human rights, civil rights and their right to take legal action should they feel that they have been taken advantage of in their workplace.
Conversations, like the one I experienced today, really motivate me to push forwards with my topic area. What I am exploring is not just something I am researching for the purposes of my degree but it is something that I am genuinely passionate about and that I want to advocate for in the future. Being in the professional environment of a dancer is so challenging and more than ever I have come away from today's interview having had an insight into a dancer's reluctance to stand up for what is not right in their workplace. It is terrible to think that a climate of hesitance exists when it comes to dancer's wanting to speak out for themselves and gain the rights to fair working hours, salary, pension plans, holiday pay, health insurance and any other number of problems which everyday working people may take for granted.
My next job is to transcribe today's interview and pull out key points and quotes that I want to take forwards for discussion in my critical review. Slowly but surely ideas are emerging...
Lily Jane Grundy | English National Ballet School, 2015 Graduate | Studying BA Honours Professional Practice in Arts, Middlesex University
Search Lil' Blogger
Monday, 31 October 2016
Module 3 - Thinking Creatively
I was so pleased to finally be able to join in on a breeze/Skype session with Paula Nottingham and other Module 3 students like myself. It is always such an encouragement to chat to those who are at a similar stage to you and to throw some ideas around to get brains ticking.
We started off by reviewing what stage we are all at and how we are managing our time and resources effectively to make the most out of the short, hectic time we have left on the BAPP course. Once again this diagram proved to be really useful:
(Taken from the slides presented by Paula throughout the session)
Surrounding these stages, Paula reiterated how important it is for us to carry on with blogging, discussing, using our SIG's, reading our Handbooks and just generally getting involved in the whole BAPP community. When we are so close to the finishing line it is important for us not to lose focus and give up. I only know from my own experience of this Module that it can be stressful and challenging as there is so much to think about. I find myself making lists everyday and creating a timetable of what I can fit in and when. This really helps me to keep on top of the work I have to do and also to not forget a important tasks I have to completed.
I guess you could think of it as running a marathon. You train for so long and do all of the preparation (research, literature review, setting up interviews etc) that when it finally comes to physically running, it's quite a daunting task! When faced with a challenge like this, you have to think about pacing yourself and jogging along at a steady, manageable pace. It is important to not hit a wall, freak out and panic yourself into a frenzy where productivity and progress is impossible. Just keep running and you'll get there!
Paula also commented on how there is almost too much information out there and when you look at how much you have accessed and collected it can seem really confusing. It is like a huge painting hung in a gallery that looms over you and challenges you to appreciate all of its intricate visuals. Paula said to focus in on a part of the bigger picture to prevent yourself from feeling overwhelmed and lost amongst your research. I have to admit that I myself am aware of how much information I need to sort through in an attempt to decide what is really relevant and beneficial to my inquiry. So I am happy to have had this reassurance from Paula to prompt me to figure out where I am and where I want to go with my inquiry.
Paula also interestingly commented that it's "not just about doing, but thinking about doing". This comment has prompted me to evaluate how I am thinking about and presenting my work. It is very easy to just be "doing" things, ticking them off your to-do list and thinking that you are done with them, when actually it is really important to expand your thinking and come up with ways to do things differently. Creative thinking is so important especially due to the nature of the BAPP course and how it encouraged us to be more creative in everything we do.
This ties in nicely with a further discussion we had about our Critical Review. At around 6000 words this should also, along with our Artefact, be an interesting and creative way of us communicating what we have found out through our inquiry. I more naturally express myself through the written word and so it is a challenge for me visual aids when presenting my work. This is something that I really want to introduce more into my thinking in an attempt to be more creative and think about what I am doing rather than just doing it.
Paula also reassured us that when we are first drafting our critical review, do not worry if it appears to be messy and too long. It is part of the process to be able to edit what is there until the final concise piece is complete. This process actually allows you to get all of your ideas and research down in one place before organising it and deciding what is really worth making it to the final cut. She also mentioned about name dropping - putting in names of authors in the body of the text who are supporting your arguments. This shows that you have done your research and can appreciate those who have gone before you and contributed to the exploration of something related to your topic area.
Finally we each individually had a shot at explaining any emerging ideas that we have recently experienced. I brought up about my first interview experience and how I collected plenty of information which I now really need to get my head around. It was fascinating listening to how other students are working through the process and finding new ways to be creative with the ideas they are discovering. I also found common ground with Charnelle as we are both holding interviews at the trade union Equity. We have agreed to have a discussion in the near future about our own research and how we can assist one another in our ideas so that was a really positive development.
Overall it was a pleasure to be involved and I look forward to the next session!
We started off by reviewing what stage we are all at and how we are managing our time and resources effectively to make the most out of the short, hectic time we have left on the BAPP course. Once again this diagram proved to be really useful:
(Taken from the slides presented by Paula throughout the session)
Surrounding these stages, Paula reiterated how important it is for us to carry on with blogging, discussing, using our SIG's, reading our Handbooks and just generally getting involved in the whole BAPP community. When we are so close to the finishing line it is important for us not to lose focus and give up. I only know from my own experience of this Module that it can be stressful and challenging as there is so much to think about. I find myself making lists everyday and creating a timetable of what I can fit in and when. This really helps me to keep on top of the work I have to do and also to not forget a important tasks I have to completed.
I guess you could think of it as running a marathon. You train for so long and do all of the preparation (research, literature review, setting up interviews etc) that when it finally comes to physically running, it's quite a daunting task! When faced with a challenge like this, you have to think about pacing yourself and jogging along at a steady, manageable pace. It is important to not hit a wall, freak out and panic yourself into a frenzy where productivity and progress is impossible. Just keep running and you'll get there!
Paula also commented on how there is almost too much information out there and when you look at how much you have accessed and collected it can seem really confusing. It is like a huge painting hung in a gallery that looms over you and challenges you to appreciate all of its intricate visuals. Paula said to focus in on a part of the bigger picture to prevent yourself from feeling overwhelmed and lost amongst your research. I have to admit that I myself am aware of how much information I need to sort through in an attempt to decide what is really relevant and beneficial to my inquiry. So I am happy to have had this reassurance from Paula to prompt me to figure out where I am and where I want to go with my inquiry.
Paula also interestingly commented that it's "not just about doing, but thinking about doing". This comment has prompted me to evaluate how I am thinking about and presenting my work. It is very easy to just be "doing" things, ticking them off your to-do list and thinking that you are done with them, when actually it is really important to expand your thinking and come up with ways to do things differently. Creative thinking is so important especially due to the nature of the BAPP course and how it encouraged us to be more creative in everything we do.
This ties in nicely with a further discussion we had about our Critical Review. At around 6000 words this should also, along with our Artefact, be an interesting and creative way of us communicating what we have found out through our inquiry. I more naturally express myself through the written word and so it is a challenge for me visual aids when presenting my work. This is something that I really want to introduce more into my thinking in an attempt to be more creative and think about what I am doing rather than just doing it.
Paula also reassured us that when we are first drafting our critical review, do not worry if it appears to be messy and too long. It is part of the process to be able to edit what is there until the final concise piece is complete. This process actually allows you to get all of your ideas and research down in one place before organising it and deciding what is really worth making it to the final cut. She also mentioned about name dropping - putting in names of authors in the body of the text who are supporting your arguments. This shows that you have done your research and can appreciate those who have gone before you and contributed to the exploration of something related to your topic area.
Finally we each individually had a shot at explaining any emerging ideas that we have recently experienced. I brought up about my first interview experience and how I collected plenty of information which I now really need to get my head around. It was fascinating listening to how other students are working through the process and finding new ways to be creative with the ideas they are discovering. I also found common ground with Charnelle as we are both holding interviews at the trade union Equity. We have agreed to have a discussion in the near future about our own research and how we can assist one another in our ideas so that was a really positive development.
Overall it was a pleasure to be involved and I look forward to the next session!
Sunday, 30 October 2016
Interview #1
Journal entry written whilst I was on my journey home following my first interview at the Equity HQ...
Feeling quite positive this evening! Finally I've got the ball rolling and held my first interview earlier on today. Prior to the interview, I was getting a bit stagnant with collecting information and was struggling to find fresh ideas to immerse myself in. I was really craving some new information to analyse and get excited about. That's why I am so thrilled with how today went. I'm pleased to have learnt so many new things about Equity itself and how it supports performers in the UK. Today's interview has opened up some new areas for inquiry and some of the ideas that emerged will be fantastic for carrying on into my next 2 interviews with professional dancers...
I was pleased with how well the conversation flowed as I must admit I was a little nervous beforehand because I wanted to make sure that I made the most out of the interview. But the interviewee was really generous with their responses offering a wealth of information for me to go away and analyse further. It was interesting to talk about just how essential Equity is for performers in the UK as well as going deeper into the free legal advice/aid services they offer to their members.
I am glad to have come away from today having asked so many of the questions that I have struggled to find the answers to from my own secondary research. To try and keep on top of everything, I have transcribed the interview this afternoon (feeling very thankful that my voice recording turned out well) and made a few extra notes to remind myself of some of the avenues I was recommended to explore by the interviewee.
All in all it was a successful interview!
I was pleased with how well the conversation flowed as I must admit I was a little nervous beforehand because I wanted to make sure that I made the most out of the interview. But the interviewee was really generous with their responses offering a wealth of information for me to go away and analyse further. It was interesting to talk about just how essential Equity is for performers in the UK as well as going deeper into the free legal advice/aid services they offer to their members.
I am glad to have come away from today having asked so many of the questions that I have struggled to find the answers to from my own secondary research. To try and keep on top of everything, I have transcribed the interview this afternoon (feeling very thankful that my voice recording turned out well) and made a few extra notes to remind myself of some of the avenues I was recommended to explore by the interviewee.
All in all it was a successful interview!
Tuesday, 25 October 2016
Structuring my Inquiry Tools (Interviews)
I am currently in the process of organising times/dates for my interviews and focus group discussion. All of my participants have been emailed an information sheet and consent form to be signed so I feel like I am starting to get on top of things and manage my time wisely.
My biggest task at the moment is to figure out how I want to structure my interviews and focus group to get the most out of the limited time I have with my participants. As it will be the first time that I am conducting anything like this, I thought I would start by seeking some advice from Google and I found a selection of really useful websites. Beginning with a how-to-guide for conducting an interview, the following 2 links give some really useful tips:
The Open University - Conducting an Interview (Anon, undated)
https://www2.open.ac.uk/students/skillsforstudy/conducting-an-interview.php (accessed 17.10.16)
Duke Initiative on Survey Methodology (DISM): Tipsheet - Qualitative Interviewing (Anon, undated)
(This is a PDF document)
http://www.dism.ssri.duke.edu/pdfs/Tipsheet%20-%20Qualitative%20Interviews.pdf (accessed 17.10.16)
I have decided that my interviews will be semi-structured to give my interviewees room to respond how they like. This means that I will be making lists of questions/key points that I want to cover and I will systematically work through them with the interviewees allowing them time to provide the information they think to be the most relevant. This method deems the most suitable for my topic area due to the fact that there is currently little information out there. These interviews give me the opportunity to start gathering that information and developing lines for inquiry.
Before I even start posing questions to my interviewees, I am going to have to ensure that:
Question types
I have found the information on question types to be particularly useful from the 2 links above. They suggested some really good question-starters if you like! Phrases such as 'Can you tell me about...?' or 'Can you give more detail...?' or 'Do you have any examples?'. I hope that by using phrases such as this I will be able to keep the interviews moving and avoid any unwanted silences or confusion. I have incorporated a few of these into my questions and will be testing them out with my first interview which will take place this Thursday. I will update you on how it all goes - hopefully smoothly!
Recording my interviews
I will be taking a separate recording of each interview so that when I come back to analysing the data, I will be able to quickly refresh my memory on the discussion that took place and take very accurate quotes from the interviews should I so wish. I will also be taking concise notes of any points raised which I think to be important. I want to ensure that I do not miss out on any key information that could benefit my research. I will be looking further into transcribing the data following the interviews over the next couple of weeks so look out for updates!
More details to follow on how I will be structuring my focus group...
My biggest task at the moment is to figure out how I want to structure my interviews and focus group to get the most out of the limited time I have with my participants. As it will be the first time that I am conducting anything like this, I thought I would start by seeking some advice from Google and I found a selection of really useful websites. Beginning with a how-to-guide for conducting an interview, the following 2 links give some really useful tips:
The Open University - Conducting an Interview (Anon, undated)
https://www2.open.ac.uk/students/skillsforstudy/conducting-an-interview.php (accessed 17.10.16)
Duke Initiative on Survey Methodology (DISM): Tipsheet - Qualitative Interviewing (Anon, undated)
(This is a PDF document)
http://www.dism.ssri.duke.edu/pdfs/Tipsheet%20-%20Qualitative%20Interviews.pdf (accessed 17.10.16)
I have decided that my interviews will be semi-structured to give my interviewees room to respond how they like. This means that I will be making lists of questions/key points that I want to cover and I will systematically work through them with the interviewees allowing them time to provide the information they think to be the most relevant. This method deems the most suitable for my topic area due to the fact that there is currently little information out there. These interviews give me the opportunity to start gathering that information and developing lines for inquiry.
Before I even start posing questions to my interviewees, I am going to have to ensure that:
- They consent to being audio recorded
- They consent to the data being used for my professional inquiry
- They are aware of the maintenance of their anonymity
- They do not have to answer any question they do not wish to answer
- They can withdraw from the interview at any stage and without prejudice
As advised by the links above, I should strive to:
- First explain the aim/purpose of the interview - I have written myself a short paragraph giving a general overview of my professional inquiry and what I intend to achieve from each individuals interview
- Create a comfortable/relaxed environment - this is a bit more of a challenge for me due to the fact that 2 of my interviews are to be done via Skype however I intend to ease my interviewees with friendly, off-topic conversation before delving into the interview. I also need to ensure that I am in as quiet a setting as possible for all my interviews as I want the audio recordings to be as clear as is achievable
- Avoid prompting "yes" or "no" answers as well as biased responses - to avoid such responses I want to make my questions broad and open-ended so that the interviewee has the freedom to answer honestly without being lead in a specific direction
- Logical question sequence - my questions need to make sense and follow on from one another with naturally flowing transitions. In particular for myself I need to ensure that I do not over-complicate the questions/language used and make them too long
Question types
I have found the information on question types to be particularly useful from the 2 links above. They suggested some really good question-starters if you like! Phrases such as 'Can you tell me about...?' or 'Can you give more detail...?' or 'Do you have any examples?'. I hope that by using phrases such as this I will be able to keep the interviews moving and avoid any unwanted silences or confusion. I have incorporated a few of these into my questions and will be testing them out with my first interview which will take place this Thursday. I will update you on how it all goes - hopefully smoothly!
Recording my interviews
I will be taking a separate recording of each interview so that when I come back to analysing the data, I will be able to quickly refresh my memory on the discussion that took place and take very accurate quotes from the interviews should I so wish. I will also be taking concise notes of any points raised which I think to be important. I want to ensure that I do not miss out on any key information that could benefit my research. I will be looking further into transcribing the data following the interviews over the next couple of weeks so look out for updates!
More details to follow on how I will be structuring my focus group...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)